Crazy videos from the web!
-
-
Wow, holy poop! That was one heck of a ride. I look at that and I have to say it's one incredible piece of engineering marvel. How much flex and stress that aircraft took without breaking into pieces. I believe it's a Boeing aircraft.
-
Wow, holy poop! That was one heck of a ride. I look at that and I have to say it's one incredible piece of engineering marvel. How much flex and stress that aircraft took without breaking into pieces. I believe it's a Boeing aircraft.
Not buying it, but some impressive CGI, indeed. Real aircraft crumple like Reynolds wrap when punished.
-
It does look too crazy to be real. It looks like some bad wind shear and the pilot was committed to the landing. After the initial shear you can hear the throttle pull back and the plane has wing stall. the left-wing tip touches then the #1 engine cowl makes contact and throws debre forward. I would have thought the nose would have had more damage? All the twisting motion looks correct. The engine sounds and exhaust are timed perfect with the thrust reversers. If you look close to the end it's difficult to see because you only get a quick glimpse. A few feet out from the fuselage on both wings there are panels missing which are most likely just above the wing joints. With the extreme flex of the wings I would think the rivets would have failed and the panels blew off. But I couldn't see them flying off? The damage on the wing above the #2 right engine at the end is timed perfect.
Technology is crazy good today, I wouldn't discount anything. If it was real it was one hack of a ride. Kinda stretches the saying any landing in one piece is a good landing!
-
It does look too crazy to be real. It looks like some bad wind shear and the pilot was committed to the landing. After the initial shear you can hear the throttle pull back and the plane has wing stall. the left-wing tip touches then the #1 engine cowl makes contact and throws debre forward. I would have thought the nose would have had more damage? All the twisting motion looks correct. The engine sounds and exhaust are timed perfect with the thrust reversers. If you look close to the end it's difficult to see because you only get a quick glimpse. A few feet out from the fuselage on both wings there are panels missing which are most likely just above the wing joints. With the extreme flex of the wings I would think the rivets would have failed and the panels blew off. But I couldn't see them flying off? The damage on the wing above the #2 right engine at the end is timed perfect.
Technology is crazy good today, I wouldn't discount anything. If it was real it was one hack of a ride. Kinda stretches the saying any landing in one piece is a good landing!
When I was taking Flight lessons --- Any landing you could walk away from was good. Did have one that it took a while to clean the 'brown spots' off the seat. I did walk away a little shaky.
-
When I was taking Flight lessons --- Any landing you could walk away from was good. Did have one that it took a while to clean the 'brown spots' off the seat. I did walk away a little shaky.
I thought about taking flight lessons but thought with my history I should really take crash lessons. Apparently that's not an option.
I'm going to send this link to my jet pilot buddy for comment. Any pilots out there that think this could be real? Any Google-Fu folks to find a news feed on this?
-
My pilot buddy said CGI.
Quote: "There are bad landings but that's a bit much!" He added an lol...
-
Yes, it is fake. Gotta say this guy is good at what he does!
This video of a 'Garuda Indonesia plane' has been computer-generated | Fact Check (afp.com)
-
Blast from the past. About 27 or so years ago. One of my builds at the test facility. This is a GE TF34-100A
-
Flight video was from flight simulator program
-
Now this is something our infamous TRIPOD would have done
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Hyrey8P9s0c
-
-
-
-
This never gets old... and still the sexiest plane ever built. imho
-
-
-
-
Finally got myself the right tool for all of those times the instructions say "finger tight"
-