The only thing I’ve learned from Creepy Joe was that...
Conservative Politics & Daily Events Discussion
-
-
If Biden gets elected, what would you bet that he claims to solved the COVID crisis.
-
Watching the “hearings”. The Dems are all talking about the ACA, not about her qualifications. I wonder if any of these Senators would be able to stand this type of scrutiny? The Dems say that there should not be a SC Judge confirmed during a election year. Yet they were trying to confirm Garland. Such a reversal in concept. Good for me, bad for you. They say let the people vote, they did in 16 and 18. Now do your job.
-
Watching the “hearings”. The Dems are all talking about the ACA, not about her qualifications. I wonder if any of these Senators would be able to stand this type of scrutiny? The Dems say that there should not be a SC Judge confirmed during a election year. Yet they were trying to confirm Garrett. Such a reversal in concept. Good for me, bad for you. They say let the people vote, they did in 16 and 18. Now do your job.
Non of them could pass
-
Watching the “hearings”. The Dems are all talking about the ACA, not about her qualifications. I wonder if any of these Senators would be able to stand this type of scrutiny? The Dems say that there should not be a SC Judge confirmed during a election year. Yet they were trying to confirm Garrett. Such a reversal in concept. Good for me, bad for you. They say let the people vote, they did in 16 and 18. Now do your job.
If I were a republican on the committee I would love to ask one question on the record of any of the Democrats that are now saying it is wrong to confirm a SCJ in an election year.
"So sir, for the record, are you saying the Republicans were right when they chose not to confirm Obama's pick in an election year?"
-
I think it just really chaps their hide to think that in only 4 years Trump could appoint 3 Supreme Court Justices - - more than either Obama or Clinton got in 8 years
-
and with Clinton's other appointee Stephen Breyer being 82 there would be a very good chance that Trump will get to name another before he's done should he get reelected - - - -
-
and with Clinton's other appointee Stephen Breyer being 82 there
wouldwill be a very good chance that Trump will get to name another before he's doneshould he getwhen he gets reelected - - - -There. Fixed it for ya’...
-
There. Fixed it for ya’...
Don't count Biden out; the obituaries are full of his supporters; who plan on voting for him...
-
Watching the “hearings”. The Dems are all talking about the ACA, not about her qualifications. I wonder if any of these Senators would be able to stand this type of scrutiny? The Dems say that there should not be a SC Judge confirmed during a election year. Yet they were trying to confirm Garland. Such a reversal in concept. Good for me, bad for you. They say let the people vote, they did in 16 and 18. Now do your job.
they are trying to get the voters scared so they vote democrat....they all sounded like they were campaigning....everything they have done since trump announced he was running was to get rid of him.....
-
To be honest if Amy Coney Barrett does manage to get confirmed it would make dealing with a Trump loss much easier - - - in the end just about the most important thing a President can do is to fill vacant seats in the Supreme Court and at age 47 Barrett should have an impact for a long time to come - - add to that the fact that the next 2 youngest Justices are also Trump picks and even if Biden were to win the Trump legacy will be felt for a very long time.
-
There. Fixed it for ya’...
that’s the exact reason the dems have been talking about packing the court.....they want to add 3 more minority judges....black, Latino, minority women...Will guarantee they can pass any law they want like taking your guns....reparations, all republicans are Guilty racists...Impeachment of Every republican president.
-
To be honest if Amy Coney Barrett does manage to get confirmed it would make dealing with a Trump loss much easier - - - in the end just about the most important thing a President can do is to fill vacant seats in the Supreme Court and at age 47 Barrett should have an impact for a long time to come - - add to that the fact that the next 2 youngest Justices are also Trump picks and even if Biden were to win the Trump legacy will be felt for a very long time.
What a about packing the court?
-
To be honest if Amy Coney Barrett does manage to get confirmed it would make dealing with a Trump loss much easier - - - in the end just about the most important thing a President can do is to fill vacant seats in the Supreme Court and at age 47 Barrett should have an impact for a long time to come - - add to that the fact that the next 2 youngest Justices are also Trump picks and even if Biden were to win the Trump legacy will be felt for a very long time.
she can be the deciding vote on any election result conflicts....
-
What a about packing the court?
If the Democrats decide to add more Justices and to end the filibuster I guess they can do that, but, and its a big but, I also fully expect that down the road the situation will get turned around and it will bite them in behind real good
Also If they decide to open that door they won't be able to close it again and I would hope that with the exception of the far left the people will not like it very much and it will show in future elections
-
that’s the exact reason the dems have been talking about packing the court.....they want to add 3 more minority judges....black, Latino, minority women...Will guarantee they can pass any law they want like taking your guns....reparations, all republicans are Guilty racists...Impeachment of Every republican president.
problem with that is that if they go forward and open that door then there would be nothing to stop future republican administrations from adding a few more seats and filling them with conservative justices
its easy for idiots on the left to bloviate about doing such things, but its a whole different thing with really big consequences to actually do it - - - - could really piss off future voters
-
It's the Democrats that are causing a problem for the country not the Republicans. Republicans wouldn't be the first ones to want to go and pack the court it's the Dems because they can't win via The Ballot Box. Everybody's tearing down statues of Confederate heroes, what about Robert Bird that has his statue in one of the government buildings. Wasn't he a kkk member? For the life of me I can't understand where the Democrats are coming from.
-
If the Democrats decide to add more Justices and to end the filibuster I guess they can do that, but, and its a big but, I also fully expect that down the road the situation will get turned around and it will bite them in behind real good
Also If they decide to open that door they won't be able to close it again and I would hope that with the exception of the far left the people will not like it very much and it will show in future elections
what you maybe don’t realize....if they take control of the senate and keep the house...it could be decades of control for them....how much damage could they do to the country and the constitution in decades...it will be the end of our country....
-
If I were a republican on the committee I would love to ask one question on the record of any of the Democrats that are now saying it is wrong to confirm a SCJ in an election year.
"So sir, for the record, are you saying the Republicans were right when they chose not to confirm Obama's pick in an election year?"
if you noticed every politician on either side that has made any statements on the subject has had their words replayed back to them on national tv....
