I'm sure there was non-stop seeing, hearing and speaking evil on that island. Also a profound fear that Epstein might speak that evil off the island.
Attention Vendors. Please email email@example.com any instruction manuals you may have for your products. They will be added to the FILEBASE tab for members to access.
"Trump considering testifying in the impeachment hearing"
My first thought,
My second thought, his lawyers would never let his chronic lying ass testify under oath.
Final thought, Trump is messing with Dems, it will never happen.
"However"? They all have DONE things that have bettered this country. A partisan person will argue against that until the cows come home. Party blindness is a real problem inflicting millions of Americans.
Joe Biden is a gaff machine
Donald Trump steps on his own dick a lot(makes matters worse for himself).
Being in love with either does not change these facts that everybody with two working eyes and ears see and hear on a regular basis.
Becomes president of the United States on his first try and a billionaire businessman in his prior work. I wish I was that limited.
If Donald is such low hanging fruit why does the left have an empty basket ?
How did my assessment make him different than 99.8% of the population?
If you weren't addressing my assessment, what the Heck are you even talking about in relation to anything said here. Are you arguing with yourself?
I think he does it on purpose sometimes, the times he doubles down.
I also think sometimes he doesn't initially realize what he said or did was bad, but realizes after the fact. The times he tries to let it quietly pass.
Sometimes he doesn't do it on purpose and feels like an ass, those are the times he lashes out on Twitter in response to the backlash. He doesn't like that one.
But sure, if your on the right he is always a genius playing the left.
If your on the left he is always a "hapless" idiot/moron.
Then why are the democrats so feckless in their endless trek to dislodge him? Really, if President Trump is so hapless what does this say about his ineffective opposition?
When all you have is sour grapes and he’s ( fill in the blank) you’re just a clanging gong. Everyone can see it too. Weakness.
There were options put forth.
You chose "doesn't realize" which equals "hapless"
"Doesn't like it" would also equal hapless.
"Likes it" was another option which equals doing it on purpose.
"Realizes" would equal doing it on purpose or catching it after the fact.
Nice try though
But he did talk about being rich which left him open for the media to add that in, gotta give him credit man likes to step on his own dick.
I don't think anyone can argue that he steps on his own dick, A LOT. Whether he likes it or realizes it are debatable.
So your saying it's fake news?
The headline seems to be wrong/misleading. The "article"/sentence seems to be accurate.
Apparently Trump did say the emaluments clause (in the constitution) is phony. Unless implied during the press conference, he didn't mention "because he's rich".
WOW Trump just stepped on his own dick, the rebubs are pissed off.
Trump says the 'phony' Constitution 'doesn't matter' because he's 'rich'
Check your sources.
I think I do have a fair gauge of "literary value", and no, it isn't from sales. Moby Dick is considered the quintessential American novel by many, and yet its sales during Melville's lifetime were very poor indeed. Some books do start slowly, and build a fan base over years, even decades or centuries. Other books are huge best-sellers, and yet are forgotten in a few years. Some books are written to a purpose, such as education or political commentary, sometimes these books receive recognition from people or organizations in that genre.
As an author, this is in my wheelhouse, so to speak. We can argue all day about what constitutes literary value, but I ask you to notice just on thing. For the sake of praise or damnation, all my books have my name on them. When you post things in your own forum name, you do the same.
People know who I am, they know my work, and my reputation. Before they even crack the cover, they can look me up, see the salient details of my career, and judge for themselves what weight they should give my words and ideas. Someone who publishes anonymous work denies the public that transparency - hence my "graffiti" comment.
I would not consider myself a political scholar, but I've given an abbreviated CV and Bibliography below for your convenience to help you better evaluate my work and my ideas.
Daniel E. Barth "Doc"
PS: I dusted this off & took a photo for y'all... Veritas!
PhD, Science Curriculum and Instruction, Claremont Graduate University, 2007
Amgen Award, 2009 (25 best Science Teachers in North America)
President's Award for Excellence in Math and Science Teaching, Three time nominee
MS, Optical Physics of DNA, Cal Poly University, 1992
MAEd, Claremont Graduate School, 1988
BS, Physics/Field Biology, Reagan Scholar, Eureka College, 1982
Observational Astronomy, 1999
Teaching Science Through Literature, 2007
Maurice on the Moon, 2009 (Amazon best seller, Amgen Award for Science Teaching Excellence)
The Doomed Colony of Mars, 2011 (Amazon best seller)
Crisis on the Far Side, 2014 (Amazon best seller)
Chemistry without Tears, 2014
Astronomy for Educators, 2018 (Global Campus Award - best STEM textbook)
Revolt in Volkov Crater, 2019 (In press)
Grim Wisdom: 40 Years of Deep Thoughts and Cheap Shots from the Classroom, 2019 (In press)
Crisis on the Far
I wasn't discrediting you, simply pointing out that many things can give a book literary value.
How is "anonymous" any different than many great writers that use an alias?
Trade deals uplifting the economy matter to me much more than the smoke screen being pushed. How about the USMCA? Get it done!
Looks like Nancy is working on that while the House intelligence Committee does it's thing. That has to be awkward talking to Trump about the trade deal, while trying to remove him.
Agree- but it is not impeachment, it is an “inquiry”. Or - “ let’s see how much damage we can do to Trump because we can’t figure out how to win on our own” Inquiry. It would be impeachment IF they actually had something and the votes to proceed. For now it’s a fishing trip.
And, BTW WOLF I liked your “breaking news” post🙂👍🏼. I’m getting tired of everything being “breaking news “ too AND a certain other person telling me to “buckle up “ EVERY night. It’s all a circus unfortunately.
I'm unfamiliar with someone saying "buckle up" every night, but I understand that most anchors and pundits have a catchy phrase to keep you interested. Which for most people loses it's desired effect after the first 3-4 times. The crying wolf story comes to mind.
EDIT: btw, I did say inquiry once in there.
I don't see how this Impeachment could be tearing the country apart. I mean, the over sensitive snowflakes are getting their impeachment inquiry. The Republicans, by all non-snowflake accounts, shouldn't and don't have "feelings" on the subject. If they did, they surely don't think the snowflakes should let Republican feelings get in the way.
I have had a lengthy discussion about this same subject with a friend of mine (who is also my lawyer) who happens to be a voting member of the FL DP ..
Now someone has put what we both thought would be the only reasonable outcome in a well written article even if it is posted on the FOX News site ....
Not that either of of think any of this is "reasonable" but we both came to the same conclusion from different directions ....
Guess we will see ... we both think this is doing nothing but further dividing and hurting the country, we also both agree that if it goes on much longer the negative effects will last well past when we will be around to see it.
Didn't know that was a thing. Thanks for the info.
New book release this week (all the bad stuff about Trump) "A Warning" by Anonymous Interesting???????????????????
I have no interest in reading it. Though I do wonder if Congress can subpoena an anonymous writer if there are things written in the book that they think can help them.