Display MoreI wasn't speaking to what they were accused of doing.
I was speaking about how Trump and Kavenaugh had MULTIPLE accusers. Some of which weren't covered much, merely mentioned in the press, because they had foggy, inconsistent stories.
Which YES, as you pointed out is "not exactly the same - hell not even close" to a single accusation from somebody that changes their story.
Also, the way Kavenaugh and Trump dealt with it is also falls under, "hell, not even close".
I am speaking to what they are accused of - and one is accused of a legal crime and has credible people who say they were told about it at the time and can recount details that match and a mother who at the time was on Larry King talking about it and we have the tape of that interview as solid evidence
The other is accused of bad and possibly morally offensive conduct at a drunken party that took place at a place at a party. The victim could not remember exactly where the party was, her so called witnesses could not give any verifiable evidence. On top of this the accused had witnesses that said he was not even at the party and there was another man who came out and said it was him that was at the party
lets forget about how its being actually covered by the media - - lets simply address which one of these is the more serious issue and which one deserves the more in depth investigation by both the law and the Media?
