Media bias backfire, this is funny.
Conservative Politics & Daily Events Discussion
-
-
Media bias backfire, this is funny.
Wait till this circulates. No comment needed the video says all I need to say!
-
Bill Martin I don't comment much in here, but definitely follow.. Thanks for reminding all to be civil..
-
..... Well done MR. Sekulow ... well done sir ...
.....
.
-
..... Well done MR. Sekulow ... well done sir ...
.....
.
You wanna talk about the Danger Zone ...
-
Bill Martin I don't comment much in here, but definitely follow.. Thanks for reminding all to be civil..
Getting to be one of the few things I remember about lawyering - if you get mad or name call you have lost the argument !! Trump has and excuse - he ain’t a lawyer but what about all the Democrat lawyers - what’s their excuse
-
Getting to be one of the few things I remember about lawyering - if you get mad or name call you have lost the argument !! Trump has and excuse - he ain’t a lawyer but what about all the Democrat lawyers - what’s their excuse
They don't need an excuse... their above the law.
-
-
So - Is it an impeachable offence if you tell someone you want to do something that could be considered an impeachable offence, but then never actually do it?
People are making a big deal about what may be in Bolton's book - but why? at most all it proves is that Trump might have said he wanted to do something - that we know was never actually done
Edit: just to add, you might say that conspiracy to commit the offence might be a crime, but conspiracy is not one of the charges
-
.
....
.
-
Didn’t you hear ?? This is Obama’s economy
-
This is what's coming and I can't wait... hope I'm not dead yet when it happens.
-
-
.
Rumor is Rand is miffed and plans something for today's hearing .....
....
.
-
I must admit that I find it interesting that all of this impeachment crap can happen based on a "whistle blower" that can remain unknown.
Seriously, how do we even know this person exists and wasn't just made up?
how can charges be brought against a person in this way? what happened to a persons right to face their accuser?
-
I have decided that I can support the calling of additional witnesses if and only if the first witness called is the whistle blower - - if the Democrats are unwilling to let this person testify then I see no reason why there is justification for any other witnesses - without the original accuser there should be no grounds the case to even exist
-
.
I hear the DNC will change their call line message tomorrow evening .....
.
......
.
-
I have decided that I can support the calling of additional witnesses if and only if the first witness called is the whistle blower - - if the Democrats are unwilling to let this person testify then I see no reason why there is justification for any other witnesses - without the original accuser there should be no grounds the case to even exist
Dems will never allow that because all it could do is help the Republicans. The Whistleblower can only testify to hearsay evidence of one side of a phone call. The Dems have already called 17 hearsay witnesses - can’t help their case at all for one more to testify - only hurt it IMO or they would have already produced him/her.
-
.
I want the IC IG deposition released as part of the existing House investigation and entered in to the Senate trial record .....
....
-
.
Did anyone else just hear Mr. Schiff say he won't dignify a response to the Senate about an unsubstantiated report in the press regarding his staff ....
....
.