One of my Nephews (Marc) helping out the community victims of the tornado that devastated Mayfield, Ky.
he’s a Pastor in upper state NY.
Conservative Politics & Daily Events Discussion
-
-
Who would have guessed the bad guys are looking for opportunities and will exploit every weakness & open opportunity.
Open Boarders?
-
-
-
This is starting to get really confusing?
-
Has anyone heard from Bill Martin? I hope he’s ok.
-
He is. Just takin some time to enjoy "the view"
-
Communist movement, communist propaganda.
-
no no your son did NOT volunteer for shit lady. YOU gave your son as a guinea pig. I wonder how much she got paid. Shame on her.
-
-
-
Only applies to everyone else, again! ...and again ..and again. She reminds me of a child looking for attention.
-
"And so they LEARN not to resist government mandates".
Oh..... my....
-
https://www.ahajournals.org/do…61/circ.144.suppl_1.10712
A published, evidence based study that you will never see the media covering.
-
https://www.ahajournals.org/do…61/circ.144.suppl_1.10712
A published, evidence based study that you will never see the media covering.
I need for that to be explained to me, what does it mean?
-
What's wrong with America first? We could do so much better if we played the same game.
Hong Kong stocks rally as Alibaba Health, Kuaishou push tech benchmark to best run in a month while HSBC jumps
Hong Kong stocks advanced for a third day, as Chinese tech companies rallied in the best winning run in a month on valuations appeal while HSBC Holdings jumped. China Life Insurance and developer Modern Land slumped amid internal financial crises. The Hang Seng Index rose 1.1 per cent to 23,23,746.54 at the close of Monday trading. The Tech Index jumped 2.2 per cent while China's Shanghai Composite Index gained 0.4 per cent. Alibaba Health Information and Kuaishou Technology both surged by more
-
In my view every country on this planet should strive to be “first” and the people of those countries should work to help their country be the best
Of course all U.S. citizens should be pulling for “America First”, And we should expect that citizens of other countries will be pulling for their country first.
One thing I have always found interesting about some people is that they seem to get upset and or feel like its some kind of attack when other countries try to out do America - - ReallY? - - isn’t that exactly what every country should be trying to do for their citizens? Be the best they can be, be number one? - - - of course we should also be trying to win and be number one, but I think its silly to get mad when other countries are simply trying to do the exact same thing we have been trying to do
-
In my view every country on this planet should strive to be “first” and the people of those countries should work to help their country be the best
Of course all U.S. citizens should be pulling for “America First”, And we should expect that citizens of other countries will be pulling for their country first.
One thing I have always found interesting about some people is that they seem to get upset and or feel like its some kind of attack when other countries try to out do America - - ReallY? - - isn’t that exactly what every country should be trying to do for their citizens? Be the best they can be, be number one? - - - of course we should also be trying to win and be number one, but I think its silly to get mad when other countries are simply trying to do the exact same thing we have been trying to do
Agreed 100% but lost at the end.
The United States has accused China of stealing the intellectual property of American firms, theft that is estimated at US$600 billion annually. As a precondition for doing business in China, American and other firms may be subjected to the forced transfer of their technology. In addition, regulations can require foreign investors to partner and set up a joint venture with a Chinese firm before they can do business in China.
Forced Technology Transfer and the US-China Trade War: Implications for International Economic Law
Wayne State University Law School Research Paper No. 2019-61
22 Pages Posted: 16 Aug 2019 Last revised: 17 Jan 2020
Julia Ya Qin
Wayne State University Law School
Date Written: September 29, 2019
Abstract
Forced technology transfer has emerged from the US-China trade war as a new issue of systemic importance. The United States, the European Union and Japan have jointly condemned forced technology transfer as a practice undermining the proper function of international trade and called for new WTO rules to discipline the practice. This article examines the issue in the broad context of international economic law. It seeks to address the following questions: What does “forced technology transfer” mean? Where did this practice come from? Why is there insufficient international regulation on the issue? What exactly are the problems inherent in such practice? And what can be done to improve the relevant international regulation?
Abstract
Intellectual property (“IP”) represents one of the main controversies of U.S.– China trade relations in the past three decades and remains one of the core issues behind the two countries’ recent trade frictions. This Article provides an overview of the current IP debates between the two largest economies in the world. It illustrates the transformation of the Chinese government’s role from inactive IP law enforcer to active facilitator of access to and acquisition of foreign technologies. This study further explains how China’s approach to learning western technologies has transformed from low-end imitation to gaining a controlling stake in foreign companies via joint ventures or outbound investments. More importantly, this Article discusses the legal and policy implications of the IP issues in this trade war. I argue that the recent IP trade war represents the struggle for global technological leadership as well as a new institutional competition in the post-Cold War era. Moreover, China’s “economic aggression,” as the United States understands it, has caused a number of unsolved issues for the international IP regime, which include the justification of China’s controversial IP policies for the purpose of industrial catch-up as well as the evidentiary and legal bases for holding China liable for its economic aggression in relation to IP.
-
Agreed 100% but lost at the end.
The United States has accused China of stealing the intellectual property of American firms, theft that is estimated at US$600 billion annually. As a precondition for doing business in China, American and other firms may be subjected to the forced transfer of their technology. In addition, regulations can require foreign investors to partner and set up a joint venture with a Chinese firm before they can do business in China.
Forced Technology Transfer and the US-China Trade War: Implications for International Economic Law
Wayne State University Law School Research Paper No. 2019-61
22 Pages Posted: 16 Aug 2019 Last revised: 17 Jan 2020
Julia Ya Qin
Wayne State University Law School
Date Written: September 29, 2019
Abstract
Forced technology transfer has emerged from the US-China trade war as a new issue of systemic importance. The United States, the European Union and Japan have jointly condemned forced technology transfer as a practice undermining the proper function of international trade and called for new WTO rules to discipline the practice. This article examines the issue in the broad context of international economic law. It seeks to address the following questions: What does “forced technology transfer” mean? Where did this practice come from? Why is there insufficient international regulation on the issue? What exactly are the problems inherent in such practice? And what can be done to improve the relevant international regulation?
Abstract
Intellectual property (“IP”) represents one of the main controversies of U.S.– China trade relations in the past three decades and remains one of the core issues behind the two countries’ recent trade frictions. This Article provides an overview of the current IP debates between the two largest economies in the world. It illustrates the transformation of the Chinese government’s role from inactive IP law enforcer to active facilitator of access to and acquisition of foreign technologies. This study further explains how China’s approach to learning western technologies has transformed from low-end imitation to gaining a controlling stake in foreign companies via joint ventures or outbound investments. More importantly, this Article discusses the legal and policy implications of the IP issues in this trade war. I argue that the recent IP trade war represents the struggle for global technological leadership as well as a new institutional competition in the post-Cold War era. Moreover, China’s “economic aggression,” as the United States understands it, has caused a number of unsolved issues for the international IP regime, which include the justification of China’s controversial IP policies for the purpose of industrial catch-up as well as the evidentiary and legal bases for holding China liable for its economic aggression in relation to IP.
Do you honestly believe that the U.S. hasn’t done all of the exact same things we accuse others of doing?
I love my country, but I would have to be a fool to believe we haven’t cheated and stolen and lied to get ahead, Heck I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised to discover we invented corporate espionage
I think you would have to be very naive to believe this country hasn’t done absolutely everything at one time or another that we now get all bent out of shape when we think others are doing - - - We invented the game and rule number one is “don’t dare do to us what we have done to others”
-
He is. Just takin some time to enjoy "the view"
Whoa!!!
That's wicked awesome!!
Angie must be sweeping the porch.......
Or back to the pole dancing!!
(Gotta jump to the NSFW section to see the pics Uncle BillyBob posted!!)