Posts by WOLF

Attention Vendors. Please email robert@rabtech.com any instruction manuals you may have for your products. They will be added to the FILEBASE tab for members to access.

    How about "Make America Great Again" or "Keep America Great" that is not politcial. My buddy will find out in a little while.

    They didn't give me examples.


    Here is an article on the subject.


    https://www.npr.org/2018/02/28…freedom-from-intimidation


    According to this article, those hat/shirts would fall under "political" as it is commonly known to be a Trump shirt/hat. A gray area arises on whether it could apply to every election as a Republican item or just a Trump presidential election.

    That is ridiculous. The smell of urine will drive people out of town, then she'll realize not all her ideas are winners.:00008862:

    I just went and voted and they would not let me wear my Trump 45 ball cap. I told them that I bet I could wear a Dem, cap, right.

    Actually, when I worked the polls, there is a strict rule that no political signs, pins, hats, shirts... are allowed within 50 or 100 feet of the entrance of the polling building.

    WOLF - do you happen to remember this little jewel ?!!!....


    He was really pro business :00008862::00008862:

    Who doesn't. You know I'm just busting chops. We already established in Trumps first week in office, when "his" first record high closing came in, that Obama had zero to do with the economy doing well or bad. Remember? "Obama days were good because of Bush policies and day two under Trump was because of Trump". You can't blame Obama when it goes south. Heck, since Republican policies echo for at least 4 years, you can't even blame the next person.;)

    When in a flooded basement going up a few stairs seems good I guess. Clinton era folks feeling that everyone regardless of means should have a house kicked us all in the posterior. 2008 did not need to happen. It was a Washington mess with ALL of the DC swamp involved. And yes I said ALL.


    And, as said prior, the economy got better IN SPITE of Obama NOT because of him.


    JMO

    Dismissing record highs despite starting in "a flooded basement" is par for the course. Please go on about "all" in an effort to sound fair.

    Yep, its up big time! An unbiased historical document.

    You do understand that PDF shows a continuous upswing dating back to the Obama days, where there were also historically record highs, right?


    You are right though, it is a good thing that Trump kept the good times rolling.

    EO 13834 Efficient Federal Operations signed by President Trump


    Good things in here! For our future, for our children. Not fake news, It's not opinion. It's not B.S. It's for real! It's what truly counts. It's an Executive Order.


    https://www.sustainability.gov/resources-eo-efo.html

    This, I suspect is your favorite part.


    "Executive Order 13693 of March 19, 2015 (Planning for Federal Sustainability in the Next Decade), is revoked."




    https://www.epa.gov/greeningep…ustainability-next-decade


    Weird how you see a dirtier environment as a great thing "for our future, for our children".

    Since the Dow is up 33%, since Trump came into office, wonder how many Democrats will or perhaps already have sent their windfall profits in to the treasury from their portfolio. Or perhaps they don’t invest in the markets and corporate greed as a matter of principle.


    Just wondering....

    Some unbiased facts for you.


    https://www.investopedia.com/a…hen-obama-took-office.asp



    Why do many Republicans seem to have amnesia or try to constantly rewrite history to fit a narrative?


    Just wondering...

    You got that right. I'm glad you didn't put "fake news" in quotes. That means you meant truly fake news and not that B.S. Trump and his loyalist cry about. You know, the true and accurate bad news about Trump that is "fake" because they don't like it.


    By the way, you are right about #6. You should tell your fellow Republicans to quit selling out our children for corporations and greed.;)


    Many articles out there.


    https://apps.publicintegrity.org/oil-education/

    What are the thoughts on Bloomberg getting in on the Democrat run for POTUS?

    It would appear that he sees the current crowd as unacceptable. The problem for dems is he will pull support from Biden who has the best chance of beating Trump. Maybe being a billionaire he likes the Trump economy and sees keeping him in office as a good move financially.

    That is a very plausible hypothesis.

    I like it.:thumbsup: I've always been a fan of offset logos and always prefer subtle to flashy/bold.

    Back during the Gulf War I think it was Target and Star Bucks would not support our troops. There was more to it than just that and besides at the time Target was owned by the French. To many years ago for me to remember all of the details. But I still do not buy from either one. Even if things are different now I will never buy from either one.

    Ok, I have your answers. Target was never French owned, it did expand into Canada(French?) and India, but has always remained an American Company that started as Good Fellows Dry Goods in 1902. It has bought and sold many other department stores, but has always remained headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota.


    Apperantly the "Not support troops" rumor stemmed from Target not allowing the Salvation Army to collect money, for veterans, on their properties.

    Back during the Gulf War I think it was Target and Star Bucks would not support our troops. There was more to it than just that and besides at the time Target was owned by the French. To many years ago for me to remember all of the details. But I still do not buy from either one. Even if things are different now I will never buy from either one.

    Sounds like I need to do some research. I never knew they were French owned or the war stuff.

    It was an opinion article, AND precisely a call for implementation. I cannot say how you can claim that "there is really no indication as to which side the author leans on" when they cite a specific plan to circumvent the 2nd amendment by attacking and banning ammunition in order to makes guns useless. That seems rather clear.

    I'm pretty sure that if there is an "implied right of privacy" in the constitution which has been cited in many court decisions, then there is also an implied protection on ammunition in the right to bear arms - which shall not be infringed. And a call to infringe upon the constitutional 2A rights is EXACTLY what this author is calling for.


    I dunno if Target has a sale on tin foil (I don't shop there anymore), but I do know that they have reading glasses. Alas, glasses only help you see, they do not help you understand.

    Alas, I see and understand. That is what happens when I glance through something at work. Sorry about that. You were correct on the author's position and his view of a good plan. But he is just some random guy in some obscure paper(if it's a paper) giving his opinion. To be so scared when he has done nothing more than me here and holds as much power as me here, seems a little silly.


    You know, Walmart probably sells Aluminum foil. I wouldn't know. Alas, aluminum foil only helps you feel protected personally, it doesn't help your over active imagination.

    You do understand that was an opinion article, that merely was talking about what if's, right? There was no call to implement it and really no indication as to which side the author leans on the subject.


    I think Target has a sale on tin foil if you need any.;)

    In my county many subdivision streets are only maintained by the city or county. They are actually owed by the residents. There was one particular sub that was horrendous. Many of the homeowners came out to yell at us while we simply did our job of patching the road. They would yell, "When are you guys going to fix these roads"? I would respond, "We only patch it. If you want it fixed pass the millage that you and your neighbors declined the last 3 times. You guys own the road, not the city and not the county. Give your neighbors all that attitude".