Pelosi and her pens: It is a historical moment, just like passing an executive order...Trump does the same multiple pens thing when he signs bills or executive orders. Obama did it, Bush did it. It's a momento that is given to those involved or sometimes affected by the action. Funinthesun it isn't an illegal gift or stealing, especially when a government owned pen is given to another government employee.
If people/senators listened to the House hearings it is very understandable that they have made up their minds already(those in The House did). Basically if they say he is innocent or guilty before the Senate trial begins, doesn't necessarily mean they are biased.
After the House hearings I would conclude from all the testimony that Trump told many people to "talk to Rudy", even to the President of Ukraine in the "perfect call". Rudy then told several of those that testified that, "Aid was to be withheld until the Ukranian President ANNOUNCES an investigation into the Biden's and Burisma"(the company Hunter Biden worked for) by order of President Trump. It would also seem all these Rudy conversations took place outside of the normal government channels, at times at odds with the official channels. Trump who infamously bashes anyone that slights him, has not said one bad thing about Rudy. That leads me to believe that Rudy was in fact speaking for Trump on this deal.
All of the witnesses the Republicans requested in the House investigation were requested to help prove Biden guilty of a crime. If Biden is guilty of a crime investigate him and prosecute him. Biden's guilt has no bearing on Trump's guilt. The House investigation showed that Trump was only seeking an ANNOUNCEMENT of the opening of an investigation into the Biden's and Burisma, not of ALL corruption in Ukraine as the Republicans and Trump claim. I do think Trump should allow all requested documents to be released and all the pertinent House requested witnesses to testify. I don't think the accused should be able to control what witnesses can be called and what documents can be seen. If he is as innocent as he claims, they could only help exonerate him. After hearing testimony during The House hearings, I know I would like to hear from Bolton, Mulvaney, Rudy and one other guy who's name escapes me right now.
The new evidence from Lev Parnas doesn't require that you trust him or his word. His words are backed up by email, text, WhatsApp and phone records.
I will be going into a anti media/ outside influence bubble once the trial begins and only be listening to or watching C-Span. I will see or hear the entire trial. That is what I did during the House hearings and I feel better informed because of it.
Here is the link to C-Span Radio so that all interested can listen when they are away from a television or Sirius satellite radio.
https://www.c-span.org/networks/?channel=radio
samowens44 I will change my votes during the trial, if new evidence is presented, but won't be able to participate in conversation about the trial during the trial.