Posts by Cape Sling

    They didn't respond because you never 'tagged' them - you have have to use their user name. Example: @Cape Sling


    Also, you keep using "Alfa" (when their actual business name is Alpha Powersports) so they wouldn't probably even recognize the call out.


    Just sayin'...

    I never wanted to discredit Alfa they were always strait up and trustworthy with me! I really do not intend to continue this thread but you are correct Larry. Alfa would stand up. But on the other hand, they read these posts all the time...


    I'm putting my panties on and going to the MX-5 forums. (really did miss air conditioning)

    You may not like me anymore because I made a mistake in calculating the front area whereas I left out the windscreen which adds anywhere from 5 to 7 square feet. It's more like 728 hp needed for 180 mph.

    Flybuddy, I was the naysayer. I fully agree with you. And, one gust of cross wind at that speed will send the SS into a death spin. Add a top (required here in Florida) and you are much better off going a different route.

    In aviation there are several model aircraft that have a wide variety of engine options. Although the higher hp versions on the same airframe will climb faster, carry more and accelerate better, there's very little difference in top speed.
    At the speeds suggested here it's worth pointing out that parasitic drag increases exponentially. Double the speed and you quadruple the drag. 180 would have 9 times the drag over 60 causing the need for excessive HP to overcome the drag and rolling resistance.
    You can plug in numbers on the site below. I used a high drag coefficient of 1, 11 sq feet of frontal area, 1900 lbs and 180 mph. Chart shows the need for 450 hp making this theoretically possible.
    Calculate HP For Speed

    I always knew why I liked you.

    We have been around in these forums together for a while. Aerodynamics play a major role, the USAF proved you could push a brick through the air with enough power with the F-4.One could believe the Slinshot is not capable in theory with out trying to do it themselves or one could listen to those who have pushed them.
    I for one have about 330 HP at the rear wheel and have accelerated through 140 more times than I should have. It happens really fast with 10.5 inches of boost.
    Don't get me wrong, I don't believe 180 is attainable with our set ups. Especially considering on a dyno at max rpm 184 was made without an airload.

    We used to say that the F-4 scared the earth away in order to fly. You are dating me friend.

    Well, RAB has near 700hp (I lost track) and HP does not translate to speed. Mix that in with aerodynamics that are worthy (to quote at fellow member) of a barn door and this is not a combination that leads to 180MPH. Not that I would ever challenge anyone but speedos are only accurate to 60 mph. GPS speed is the reference used in Europe.

    I'll let yall set the speed record. I have the power under the hood but not nearly enough man parts. :D

    RAB has enough "Man Parts" but even he can't beat physics. I still maintain that if you want a fast vehicle, buy one! One of the only ones I trust is RAB when it comes to performance. I followed him to this forum because I trusted him.



    Top speed, stock, is 130mph. I have done it 2-3 times on both Slings. Sorry, no tach in video, but if you listen to the engine it goes into a holding pattern. It was floored the whole time. Something stops it from going faster, and I don't know what it is. As @MiM stated, 4th gear is the only way to see top speed when stock.