Display More.
Just for future reference you are agreeing that using information available on the ground at the time is understandable and does not show an agenda or lack of competence even if shown to be incorrect at a later date?
To be clear, if so I agree with you .....
.....
.
That is correct. I don't hold Hillary responsible for Bengazi nor do I hold Bush Jr. Responsible for "Weapons of Mass Destruction".
My point in regards to "tear gas, rubber bullets, smoke canisters and pepper balls" is that to me it is semantics since the outcome is the same. Tear gas and rubber bullets sounds worse, but the outcome, feeling and look is quite similar to pepper balls and smoke canisters. Just be upfront with what you used, rather than just saying "we didn't use that" to each accusation as they come in.
I also understand that with the current and up coming Senate inquiries coming, some previous "facts" may be found to be less than facts contrary to one parties beliefs. Some may also, contrary to one parties hopes, be found to be factual.
I'm not sure you agree with me though. There have been many times you disagreed with the "facts on the ground" and chose to side with "alternate facts".