Bill Martin and Shatneyman like this.
EjFord and Travis like this.
EjFord and franklewtie like this.
Bill Martin and kev like this.
EjFord likes this.
Bill Martin likes this.
EjFord, Bill Martin and funinthesun like this.
EjFord and 4 others like this.
EjFord and 3 others like this.
Bill Martin likes this.
WOLF likes this.
Display MoreHere is my proposal
Every birth certificate by law needs to name a mother and father (who will be held financially responsible for that child until 18 years of age.)
Unless you can legally prove with an arrest and conviction, rape or incest. Only exemptions.
Can’t name a father you are not eligible for welfare, food stamps or any other public assistance.
Why do you hate women?
A wall eliminates or reduces the number of border agents required to patrol the border.
Example
If each agent makes $50,000 a year and gets medical, vacations and retirement money, how much does each agent cost the tax payers?
Common sense says once the wall is built there will be very little maintenance money required. So in actuality a wall is much cheaper than paying thousands of border agents forever to do the job of a one time wall.
Which do you want to pay for?
Wall once or extra agents forever?
A wall saves us millions a year. Year after year.
Sure someone can get over it once in a while but thats what the added technolgy helps to detect.
Ok a moment is up
Justice is coming.
Display MoreDid I ever say we should just let them come in? NO!!! I did not.
Are there guys with guns waiting to "SHOOT" everyone that comes over or through every inch of the border wall? NO!!
Will there be? NO!!!
Are every inch of prison walls watched or monitored 24/7 , as well as the prisoners? YES!!!
If you walked 2000 miles to get to the U.S.A. and you had to walk an extra 200 miles to go around a wall would you? YES!!!
.........................
For the record, that is twice the fetus loving Republicans have called for shooting, murdering, executing every man, woman and child that comes over the border illegally. (That is how stupid it sounds when people link a whole party to one/couple member's ideology).
But Mathew, if we just let them come in unrestrained. just imagine how more Eagle fans there would be!! 
But Mathew, if we just let them come in unrestrained. just imagine how more Eagle fans there would be!!
Oh, pick me! I know,.. I know,... 2! That would make in the country a total 6
Oh, pick me! I know,.. I know,... 2! That would make in the country a total 6
Lol, are there any in Philly? I know one other than me in Michigan. That leaves two available for the rest of the country.
I heard an awesome promo on a radio station today.
"Who's playing in the game this weekend"?
"There is only one team playing. Welcome to the Brady Bowl, where Tom Brady will go for his 6th Brady Bowl ring. Brady is leading the game. Now for the Brady half time show. Brady has won his 6th Brady Bowl Chapionship".
Why do you hate women?
Just for clarity approximately half of the babies killed are female.
I understand the political rhetoric when it comes to abortion. What I don't understand is the current trend to push for infanticide. I have friends and family in the medical field and none of them can answer a very simple question for me, maybe someone here can. What medical condition creates a situation where killing a baby before delivering it is necessary?
Why do you hate women?
How do you figure I hate women?
This has to do with making men responsible to pay for their kids...why should you or I have to pay for their kids with our tax money?
There shouldn’t be any absentee fathers....it took two to make them now the two need to take financial responsibility....they are skating away from their fatherly duties and sticking me with them and I don’t like it....
Plus if a woman wants an abortion shouldn’t the father have anything to say in the matter?
I understand the political rhetoric when it comes to abortion. What I don't understand is the current trend to push for infanticide. I have friends and family in the medical field and none of them can answer a very simple question for me, maybe someone here can. What medical condition creates a situation where killing a baby before delivering it is necessary?
That would depend on how old the fetus is and if I can survive outside the womb.
I know women whose uterus ruptured or just wasn’t strong enough to keep the fetus inside her body anymore, but it wasn’t old enough to survive.
Now you have a mother who is going to bleed to death ....so what do you do?
Let them both die?
A real doctor would ultimately want to keep both alive and do everything humanly possible to get to that end...sometimes life saving decisions have to be made....
Voluntarily ending a pregnancy for convenience isn’t right....
They said more abortions have been preformed than every soldier killed in every war....
Display MoreHere is my proposal
Every birth certificate by law needs to name a mother and father (who will be held financially responsible for that child until 18 years of age.)
Unless you can legally prove with an arrest and conviction, rape or incest. Only exemptions.
Can’t name a father you are not eligible for welfare, food stamps or any other public assistance.
You appear to hate women when you demand "arrest and conviction" for the women to prove they were raped.
If a woman is drugged, or raped in an alley by unknown assailants, how is she suppose to meet your requirements for assistance?
"For clarity" Red that is what I was referring to.
"half are female", no shit.
I also highly doubt you talked to the right type of doctors if you couldn't get a list of child defects that would require late term abortion. Not to mention a list of situations that could threaten the mother's life late in the term. You know that drug epidemic? That ruins a bunch of unborn children.
Display MoreYou appear to hate women when you demand "arrest and conviction" for the women to prove they were raped.
If a woman is drugged, or raped in an alley by unknown assailants, how is she suppose to meet your requirements for assistance?
"For clarity" Red that is what I was referring to.
I also highly doubt you talked to the right type of doctors if you couldn't get a list of child defects that would require late term abortion. Not to mention a list of situations that could threaten the mother's life late in the term. You know that drug epidemic? That ruins a bunch of unborn children.
If the goal is to kill the "defective" ones it sends us down a very slippery slope. If you want a son any female babies are "defective". No more special needs people just kill any babies that aren't perfect.
I biggest issue is killing babies that are fully formed and able to survive outside the womb. With all the medical technology and testing available problems can be detected prior to the third trimester. If delivery is the threat to to the mother late term babies need to be delivered dead or alive, why kill them?
BTW Two if those Doctors were OBs, they were the ones that said the baby needed to be delivered regardless of viability.
If you get the answer please share it.
If the goal is to kill the "defective" ones it sends us down a very slippery slope. If you want a son any female babies are "defective". No more special needs people just kill any babies that aren't perfect.
I biggest issue is killing babies that are fully formed and able to survive outside the womb. With all the medical technology and testing available problems can be detected prior to the third trimester. If delivery is the threat to to the mother late term babies need to be delivered dead or alive, why kill them?
The ones that are dying in the womb and won't survive outside the womb are the ones covered in NY's law. I can't understand how you can't understand the concept. There are some horrible scenarios out there and I gaurantee the parents are more pissed off and hurt by the prospect of terminating their pregnancy more than you are.
To help you, I'll speak like Trump.
"Call it what you want, it doesn't have to be called late term abortion, call it terminal late term C-section, or premature dead infant extraction, birth of dying child through C-section..."
Just for clarity approximately half of the babies killed are female.
What are the other half?
The ones that are dying in the womb and won't survive outside the womb are the ones covered in NY's law. I can't understand how you can't understand the concept. There are some horrible scenarios out there and I gaurantee the parents are more pissed off and hurt by the prospect of terminating their pregnancy more than you are.
To help you, I'll speak like Trump.
"Call it what you want, it doesn't have to be called late term abortion, call it terminal late term C-section, or premature dead infant extraction, birth of dying child through C-section..."
I think the urgency you are looking for goes away when the baby is injected and checked 24hrs later to see if it worked. If it's already dead you don't need to kill it, you can't make it more dead.
Maybe some type of review and autopsy of the baby could be used to determine if it was a necessary medical procedure or murder.
Somebody please explain to me how for thousands of years the baby was born and everything was done to keep it alive - some lived - some sadly passed away. Seemed to work so why should we be having “conversations” over its life or death. Is it just me or are the Dems like some Drs and have that God complex affliction. After all - I think Pelosi, Schumer, and Waters are a cancer afflicting society - if I could pull their plug...........
What are the other half?
I do need to apologize for assuming their gender and not posting a trigger warning.
